dj- und club-kultur & elektronische (tanz)musik – dj and club culture & electronic (dance) music

Monat: Januar 2018

… to remix a classic

In a blogpost from March 2017, which appeared on my twitter-timeline just now, Funster of asks the question:

„Is it ever acceptable to remix a classic?“

Well, the question itself is already wrong. What exactly is a „classic“ in the first place, and who is it to decide which tracks are „classics“? Why should it NOT be allowed to remix? And most importantly: who should it be to allow and monitor, wheter a remix of a classic is „good“ and therefore „allowed“, or „bad“ and should therefore „be banned“? If we go down that road, we’d end up with a remix-police – and who should it be? A central committee of DJs and remixers? Your national culture ministry? The UNESCO? Funster of mixmag?

We already have such a system that works fine: it’s the huge community of DJs, fans, listeners and dancers. You don’t like the remix of „Blue Monday“ or „Born Slippy“? Well: Don’t play it, don’t buy, vote it down on Youtube. If you hear it being played in your club by a DJ: don’t dance to it, or let the DJ in any other (polite and friendly) way understand, that this track kills the vibe on the dancefloor (any sensitive DJ would understand that intuitively without any words, btw…). In the end, that’s what Funster himself is doing, as you can read at the end of the blogpost: „Funster is Mixmag’s Deputy Digital Editor and he’ll stop dancing if you play a shit remix.“

I personally do really like the Bulletproof/Dino Psaras remix of „Blue Monday“. It nicely translates the original into psytrance. I played it a few times and the response was great. Of course, as a DJ you need to pay attention wheter the tracks fits the overall style and atmosphere of your set, and wheter the audience would appreciate it or not. That’s basically an issue with every single track you select, but with remixes of such „classics“ the risk of failure is much higher.
I played it to a rather mixed audience of goa-fraggles and people who were not so much into it. I’d  refrain from playing it on a „strictly psytrance“-party, though.

Aktivieren Sie JavaScript um das Video zu sehen.

So, the answer to Funsters question is simple: of course it should be allowed to remix a classic. Always!

There are only two kind of limits to it: there are limits set by copyright-laws. I am just simply stating that in many cases these limits exists and that everyone violating them should be aware of what s/he does. Wheter such limits are good or bad, is not the case to discuss here.
The second kind of limits are the one set by the artists themselves, who might not want their beloved work to be remixed. No matter if you agree to that or not, that should be respected.

For everything else: just go ahead and remix whatever you want. Let the people decide if you did a good job and added something special to that classic tune, or if you failed to do so and presented yourself as a copycat.


CfP: Film Musik Kontexte. Intermediale Referenz in audiovisuellen Medien (Mainz, 21.-23.6.2018)

Das XIII. Symposium zur Filmmusikforschung findet diesmal an der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz vom 21. bis 23. Juni 2018 statt. Hier findet ihr den Call for Papers.

Filmmusikforschung ist zwar nicht per se ein Thema für DJ- und Clubmusik-Forschung, aber ich weiß z.B., dass ein Beitrag zum N.W.A.-Biopic „Straight Outta Compton“ geplant ist. Wer weiß, vielleicht finden sich noch weitere Überschneidungen, z.B. der Neuvertonung von Fritz Langs „Metropolis“ (1927) durch Giorgio Moroder (1984) oder Jeff Mills (2000)? Oder der Soundtrack und Cameo-Auftritt von Daft Punk bei „Tron“ (2010)?

Update 24.5.2018: Programm ist online, hier als pdf abrufbar.

screenshot Audio-Tape-Culture & Magazine-Culture

With the beginning of the new year, a new website and online-database has been launched: It focuses on non-commercial DIY-culture of a pre-digital music era, when xeroxed fanzines and tape-trading were the only means available to bypass the commercial system of major-labels and to promote and distribute underground music. is a Non-Profit Online-Archive & Information-Database for Audio-Tape-Culture (Cassettes/Tapes/Reels) and 20th Century Art- & Music-related Small-Press Publications / Magazine-Culture.

This Archive-Database focuses on the following styles/genres.

– Mid 70’s to late 90’s Industrial / Experimental / Free Improvisation / Post- Punk / New Wave, Minimal / Synth /Ambient and further musical directions of the DIY-Cassette-Culture.

– early 50’s to late 90’s Sound Art / Sound Poetry / Text-Sound-Compositions / Poesie Sonore / Verbosonics / Lingual Music / Music Concrete / Audio Art plus related printed Mail-Art / Concrete Poetry / Visual Poetry / Lettrisme / Fluxus


I just digged in a bit into this huge database. You will find many unknown (at least to me) and abscure bands and artists, alongside the well known pioneers of these genres like Tangerine Dream, Throbbing Gristle, Skinny Puppy, Front 242, Killing Joke, Einstürzende Neubauten and so on.

What distinguished it from (to my impression) is the focus on small, unofficial, homemade releases on cassette, tape or reel, and the vast amount of press and zines, all connected in a nice database. The press-material is scanned and available for registred members, as well as sometimes links to mp3s on filehosting services.

The look and feel of the website reflects the DYI-attitude in the 21st century: basic CMS-design 😉

via IASPM-Newsletter/Julio Mendevil

Präsentiert von WordPress & Theme erstellt von Anders Norén

Durch die weitere Nutzung der Seite stimmst du der Verwendung von Cookies zu. Weitere Informationen

Die Cookie-Einstellungen auf dieser Website sind auf "Cookies zulassen" eingestellt, um das beste Surferlebnis zu ermöglichen. Wenn du diese Website ohne Änderung der Cookie-Einstellungen verwendest oder auf "Akzeptieren" klickst, erklärst du sich damit einverstanden.